{"id":2,"date":"2008-11-10T07:47:28","date_gmt":"2008-11-10T15:47:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sabusense.com\/?page_id=2"},"modified":"2012-07-12T12:38:38","modified_gmt":"2012-07-12T16:38:38","slug":"about","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/?page_id=2","title":{"rendered":"Making Sense Through a Systemic Leadership and Management Lens"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal<\/w:View> <w:Zoom>0<\/w:Zoom> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables \/> <w:SnapToGridInCell \/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct \/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules \/> <\/w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4<\/w:BrowserLevel> <\/w:WordDocument> <\/xml><![endif]-->&#8220;<em>If you want to teach people a new way of thinking, don&#8217;t bother trying to teach them.<br \/>\nInstead, give them a tool, the use of which will lead to new ways of thinking<\/em>.&#8221;\u00a0 &#8211; Buckminster Fuller<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201cIt&#8217;s never enough to tell people about some new insight. \u00a0<\/em><em>Instead of pouring knowledge into people&#8217;s heads, you need to help them grind a new set of eyeglasses so they can see the world in a new way.\u201d &#8211; \u00a0<\/em>John Seely Brown, Ex-Director of Xerox Palo Alto Research Center<\/p>\n<p><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>WHAT A THINKING TOOL CAN CONTRIBUTE TO THINKING AND DOING<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Both Fuller and\u00a0Brown were\u00a0right in my case.\u00a0 I used this different lens as a tool for over a decade to understand what was happening in a major 140,000-student US school system continually responding to all the dynamic social and economic changes facing every urban school district.\u00a0 For me, it offered a different answer to &#8220;Why&#8221; they were happening and identified unseen possibilities for addressing them that could go to the core of the problem-causing conditions.<\/p>\n<p>Of most importance, it helped me understand why trying to make sense through the prism of the <em>pyramid<\/em> continued to produce failed strategies for change.<\/p>\n<p>Four unique characteristics of the lens made it possible to &#8220;see&#8221; and &#8220;understand&#8221; the products evoked by of this &#8220;new way of thinking.&#8221;\u00a0 {These are presented in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/?page_id=9\">CATCHING THEM DOING SOMETHING RIGHT<\/a>\u2026)<\/p>\n<p>1. <strong>Made Relationship-&#8220;seeing&#8221; possible+<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As a &#8220;<em>system-seeing<\/em>&#8221; tool, this lens, in effect, serves as an organizational MRI scanner that sees through practices to the &#8220;simple&#8221; biological &#8220;rules&#8221; underlying them at the core level where <em>knowledge<\/em> created by the brain&#8217;s pre-wired <em>learning<\/em> process begins.<\/p>\n<p>It offers a way to understand, first, how everyone is biologically wired to &#8220;make a difference&#8221; \u2026and for those in education it&#8217;s with <em>children<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Then, with that central purpose, to see how the universal <em>brain<\/em>-driven need for information becomes the definer of <strong>relationships<\/strong> needed for exchanging it, and how these soon become the formal and informal organizational <strong>structures<\/strong> needed to sustain those working relationships among interdependent <strong>roles<\/strong> the system\u2019s work requires (regardless of the skills of those whose <strong>jobs<\/strong> place them in them.)<\/p>\n<p>Because it offers this different view of the tension between &#8220;jobs&#8221; and &#8220;roles&#8221; and how work roles in a system <em>relate<\/em>, it can frame a <em>shared<\/em> <em>understanding<\/em> of relationships that can support <em>collaborative actions<\/em> that weren&#8217;t perceived possible before.<\/p>\n<p>2. <strong>Portrayed the &#8220;work system&#8221; as an <em>information-creation<\/em> and exchange process.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The values of this perspective for strategic leadership and management in schooling are a function of this fundamental nature.\u00a0 Because it portrays the school district as a coherent, connected <strong>system of work<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 It offered a simple,<em> visual<\/em> way to strip away the different meanings of &#8220;system&#8221; that blur the targets of &#8220;systemic&#8221; reform, and the words that make it seem like the work of <em>teaching<\/em>, <em>managing<\/em> and <em>leading<\/em> are based on &#8220;different&#8221; theories and processes.\u00a0 Instead it surfaces the same <em>natural <\/em>action\/learning process that underlies them all.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 It is rooted in the<em> core principles<\/em> of <em>interaction<\/em> that actually drive children&#8217;s (and adult&#8217;s) learning, and makes it possible to focus the alignment of the system&#8217;s work to the level where <em>engagement<\/em> is rooted in the interactions of experience.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 It aligns everyone&#8217;s intrinsic need to understand the meaning of their job in terms of how, in the end, <em>their role makes a difference<\/em> for individual children.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 And because the &#8220;picture&#8221; it portrayed was coherent and systemically holistic, not only in scope, but also in depth, it offered a different way to see and connect the dots that create their interdependence.<\/p>\n<p>And for me, it offered a way to grasp the coherence and developmental nature of the <em>systemic leadership<\/em> strategies that have been driving their work for the past ten years.<\/p>\n<p>3. <strong>Addressed &#8220;Learning&#8221; as a capacity, not a product<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>While it is not unique to focus on children&#8217;s <em>learning<\/em> as the purpose for education, here, the learning that serves at the focusing center of this map is the <strong>process of learning<\/strong>, not its <em>products<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>It offers a &#8220;simple&#8221; structure to see through and address the complexities of current information-driven standards, testing, and accountability strategies that are based on learning-as-<em>product<\/em>.\u00a0 When used, instead, as a means to portray and question education&#8217;s <em>Theory-of-the-Business<\/em>,&#8221; its value comes from the core belief embedded in its structure: that &#8220;learning&#8221; (as a process) is an individual <strong>capacity<\/strong> (to be developed), not a <em>product<\/em> (of that process) that seldom can be connected back to it..<\/p>\n<p>The system&#8217;s work then can be seen, understood and <strong>managed<\/strong> as the development of each child\u2019s <em>learning<\/em> <strong>capacities<\/strong> through the types of <em>interactions<\/em> it makes it possible for him\/her to be engaged in.<\/p>\n<p>4. <strong>Addressed the &#8220;Either\/Or&#8221; &#8220;learning disability&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>\u201cThe best sign of intelligence is the ability to hold good, but contradictory ideas in one&#8217;s head at the same time.<br \/>\nCharacter is to act on two good contradictory ideas.\u201d<\/strong> &#8211; James Champy<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Most surprising and challenging was that it exposed an inherent learning disability that creates the greatest barrier to the effectiveness of organizational leadership because it directly impacts the thinking of CEO\u2019s, superintendents and other system leaders.\u00a0 This is the system \u201cblindness\u201d caused by the age-old \u201c<em>Either-Or<\/em>\u201d problem of how to see \u2013 and then deal with &#8212; the <em>forest and the trees <strong>at the same time<\/strong><\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Without a way to address the &#8220;<em>Both\/And<\/em>&#8221; condition of &#8220;complementarity,&#8221; as Quantum physicists term it, we often end up focusing our thoughts and resulting efforts on &#8220;fixing&#8221; <em>people<\/em> <strong>or<\/strong> the <em>system<\/em>, but not both at the same time.\u00a0 We haven&#8217;t believed it was possible and, except for those actually accountable for the success of an entire &#8220;system,&#8221; didn\u2019t need to think much about it.<\/p>\n<p>The system-view offered by the lens highlighted how the unique requirement of a system leader&#8217;s task &#8211; to impact a &#8220;whole&#8221; system \u2013 creates a need for ways to get both their <em>mind<\/em> <strong>and<\/strong> <em>hands<\/em> around it.\u00a0 <em>System&#8217;s Thinking<\/em> and <em>Strategic Planning<\/em> can meet the first need; but there have been few ways for them to influence the continual <strong>tactical<\/strong> thinking that underlies the system\u2019s daily work.<\/p>\n<p>But, as the District&#8217;s experience demonstrated, this is not only possible, but it may be the <strong>only<\/strong> pathway to sustained systemic change.\u00a0 At the &#8220;hands-on&#8221; level, the lens&#8217; system view made it possible to connect-the-dots and &#8220;see&#8221; how the elements of their strategic improvement initiatives were coming together as a <em>strategic management<\/em> process that could support the <em>tactical problem-solving<\/em> needs at the varying levels of the district&#8217;s work.<\/p>\n<p>(See <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/?page_id=146\">New Understanding: The Complementarity of Policy and Practice<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p>Some of the additional insights that emerged from this way of understanding their journey can be found at:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/?page_id=149\">New Understanding: Decision-making relationships<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/?page_id=152\">New Understanding: A needed Role map<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/?page_id=160\">New Understanding: The X-factor at work<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>For me, this tool continues to provide a way to see through what Senge aptly describes as the complex interrelationships of <em>forests<\/em> and <em>trees<\/em> by building from the simple, <em>natural principles<\/em> about how trees <em>grow<\/em>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;\u2026the art (of seeing the Forest and the Trees) lies in seeing through the complexity to the underlying structures generating change.<br \/>\n\u2026it means organizing complexity into a coherent story that illuminates the cause of problems and how they can be remedied in enduring ways. \u2026<br \/>\nWhat we most need are ways to know what is important and what is not important, what variables to focus on and which to pay less attention to.&#8221;<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>What are those <em>natural principles<\/em>?<\/p>\n<p>CORE PRINCIPLES GROUND INTO THE LENS<\/p>\n<p>One of cognitive biology&#8217;s core principles stands at the center of the &#8220;world view&#8221; this &#8220;territorial map&#8221; portrays.<\/p>\n<p>In our <strong>minds<\/strong>, we each stand at the center of an &#8220;environment&#8221; in which we try to <em>make a difference<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>And our <strong>brains<\/strong> are <em>biologically<\/em> pre-wired to make that possible. The brain provides the OS or &#8220;Operating System&#8221; that develops and supports the <em>psychological<\/em> &#8220;software&#8221; of the mind.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/img1_bubble.gif\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-203\" title=\"img1_bubble\" src=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/img1_bubble.gif\" alt=\"The Bubble of the World We Perceive\" width=\"429\" height=\"277\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/img1_bubble.gif 429w, https:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/img1_bubble-300x193.gif 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 429px) 100vw, 429px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The continual loop nature of the thinking this common wiring supports is sometimes called <em>&#8220;problem-solving<\/em>,&#8221; <em>&#8220;trial and error<\/em>,&#8221; or in quality management &#8220;<em>PDSA- (Plan, Do, Study, Act.)<\/em>&#8220;<\/li>\n<li>As noted earlier, this <em>brain<\/em>, like other body organs, continually produces something essential to the body&#8217;s survival \u2013 <em>information<\/em>.\u00a0 It serves not just as an &#8220;engine&#8221; continually gathering in and initially processing information, but also as an &#8220;information pump&#8221; that continually seeks <em>social<\/em> connections from which to access information that can contribute to personal and organizational <em>meaning<\/em>.\u00a0 And some of the most powerful information is about our own meaning taken in through these interactive social connections with others.<\/li>\n<li>This continually cycling &#8220;loop&#8221; serves as the initial &#8220;programmer&#8221; for the &#8220;software&#8221; that the mind will continue to develop.\u00a0 This is because the <em>mind<\/em>, trying to make its job easier, stores some of the information coming in from the brain&#8217;s information-processing cycle in <em>beliefs<\/em> and <em>assumptions<\/em> (and the &#8220;paradigms&#8221; they shape) so that it doesn&#8217;t have to deal with it each time.\u00a0 But this also can make it harder when a belief-window it creates becomes a &#8220;<em>seeing-what-we-believe<\/em>&#8221; filtering barrier to noticing all of what&#8217;s actually going on &#8220;<em>out there<\/em>.&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>In this &#8220;simple&#8221; model, this <em>first belief<\/em> about the <em>brain-as-information-processor<\/em> serves as the he organizing principle &#8212; or as Joel Barker puts it, &#8220;<em>The One Thing<\/em>&#8221; \u2013 that is the center point of a new sense-making paradigm.\u00a0 Once accepted, it shapes the boundary for a mental model that frames thinking, and becomes the common reference point for making sense of the &#8220;puzzle pieces&#8221; and &#8220;dots&#8221; within it.\u00a0\u00a0 And, functionally, it can be seen as the common root of later processes we call learning, Continual Improvement, and PDSA.<\/p>\n<p>As an example, once one accepts that first belief about this &#8220;given&#8221; nature of the territory that is the &#8220;workplace of schooling,&#8221; then its three &#8220;work processes&#8221; \u2013 <em>learning, teaching<\/em> and schooling &#8212; can be aligned to it.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong><em>Learning<\/em> can be understood as a product of interaction.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/img2_learning.gif\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-205\" title=\"Learning\" src=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/img2_learning.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"185\" height=\"188\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Interactions have two ends, and if each child&#8217;s learning is a product of his\/her <em>interactions<\/em>, who is the most critical partner in the interaction?<\/p>\n<p>If it is the child, then this means he\/she is the co-creator of the &#8220;products&#8221; of the learning process whose &#8220;results&#8221; the &#8220;system&#8221; is held accountable for.<\/p>\n<p>If this is true, and each partner doesn&#8217;t have a meaningful role in the process, one might expect to find all the present day conditions that surface as student disengagement and pressures for more &#8220;accountability.&#8221;\u00a0 How might this alternative view change our thinking about &#8220;engagement&#8221; processes?\u00a0 <strong>What if each child already is engaged, and we haven&#8217;t been able to harness that natural energy?\u00a0 For example:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>If each child&#8217;s learning is a product of his\/her <em>interactions<\/em>, and the most significant <em>inter-actors<\/em> are those adults who care about them &#8212; teachers and parents \u2013 then\u2026<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong><em>Teaching<\/em> can be understood as a process of providing the <em>opportunities<\/em> for those <em>interactions<\/em>, and access to the <em>information that informs<\/em> them.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The <em>quality<\/em> of learning and teaching becomes a function of the <em>frequency<\/em> and <em>relevance<\/em> of those interactions.<\/p>\n<p>Does this have implications for change efforts that start with putting a &#8220;Quality Teacher&#8221; in every classroom?\u00a0 What if what is needed first is a <em>quality teaching process<\/em> that supports a co-managed, interactive teaching-learning process in every classroom?\u00a0 (see link\u2026\u2026)<\/p>\n<p>While it is not unique to focus on children&#8217;s <em>learning<\/em> as the purpose for education, here, the learning that serves at the focusing center of this map is the <strong><em>process<\/em> of learning<\/strong>, not its <em>products<\/em>. What are the implications of this way of thinking for dealing with the complexities of current information-driven standards, testing, and accountability strategies that are based on learning-as-<em>product<\/em>?<\/p>\n<p>And what are the implications for individualization or customization of instruction when the <strong>system&#8217;s<\/strong> core work can be seen and understood as the development of each child&#8217;s <em>learning <strong>capacities<\/strong><\/em> through the types of <em>interactions<\/em> it makes it possible for him\/her to engage in.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Schooling<\/strong> &#8211; The effectiveness of these caring adults depends to a large extent on the <em>information and support<\/em> that enables them to make decisions and take actions that are <em>individually responsive to that child\u2019s needs and requirements<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>What are the implications of this principle for the development and support of <em>school system leadership<\/em> <em>and management<\/em> if the product of their work can be understood as an <strong>integrated learning management process<\/strong>?\u00a0 One which<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>creates and sustains the core <em>interactions<\/em> that<\/li>\n<li>support and inform the school\u2019s work of managing the <em>interactions<\/em> that<\/li>\n<li>each child\u2019s individual learning process requires. (see link\u2026\u2026)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>CONNECTING THE PRINCIPLES TO PRACTICE:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Taking the Knowledge-creating and -using Mind to <em>Work<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This <em>OS-like<\/em> operating &#8220;program&#8221; is <em>always running<\/em> beneath the primary <em>mental<\/em> workplace regardless of the different <em>physical<\/em> workspaces in which it takes place such as classrooms, buildings, or districts.\u00a0 But at work another factor comes into play.<\/p>\n<p>In those purposeful workspaces, as we focus on a <em>task<\/em> or <em>job<\/em>, we now slip over to the side of the bubble and engage the &#8220;OS&#8217;s&#8221; (Operating System&#8217;s) common programming to accomplish the <em>purposes<\/em> of our work.\u00a0 The interactive dynamics and requirements of this cyclical mental process remains the same, however\u00a0 \u2013 <em>to reach out, act, learn as quickly as possible from the consequences fed back, and act again<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/img3_purposefulwork.gif\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-207\" title=\"Purposeful Work\" src=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/img3_purposefulwork.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"356\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/img3_purposefulwork.gif 600w, https:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/img3_purposefulwork-300x214.gif 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>This process, then, can substitute for the &#8220;pyramid&#8221; to frame thinking about how <em>mental<\/em> <strong>and<\/strong> <em>physical<\/em> &#8220;workspaces&#8221; align to a child&#8217;s learning.\u00a0 Note: By changing the reference point of this &#8220;map&#8221; of the organizational mental &#8220;territory,&#8221; the fundamental relationships among all the <em>jobs<\/em> and <em>roles<\/em> have not changed.\u00a0 If you turn this 900 you can still draw a &#8220;pyramid-like map&#8221; branching from what now appears as a &#8220;top&#8221; and &#8220;bottom.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/img4_map.gif\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-209\" title=\"Map\" src=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/img4_map.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"364\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/img4_map.gif 569w, https:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/img4_map-300x218.gif 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Seems &#8220;simple,&#8221; but the nature of the continually running knowledge-creating process each person brings to work creates two problem conditions.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. Duality: &#8220;<em>I am my work<\/em>&#8220;\/ I perform the System&#8217;s work.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Often a <em>duality<\/em> condition occurs, as the outer boundary of the self in the mind simultaneously overlaps the outer boundary of the physical work setting.\u00a0 We may begin to think of ourselves <em>as our work<\/em> because our personal sense of meaning and fit at work must usually (and unfortunately) be found within the confines of that physical space.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/img5_selfclassroom.gif\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-210\" title=\"Self Classroom\" src=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/img5_selfclassroom.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"286\" height=\"294\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>This consequences of this duality surface (as we shall see) when the &#8220;job&#8221; one is held accountable for performing bumps up against the &#8220;role&#8221; that the contextual conditions of one&#8217;s place in the system-of-work also requires them to respond to.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. Interdependent Autonomy<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The second problem is created because now one&#8217;s supposedly autonomous organizational <em>work<\/em>place is often &#8220;inside&#8221; of <em>someone else&#8217;s whose relationship<\/em> to you is defined by that same common end purpose for which you share responsibility.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/img6_interdependent.gif\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-211\" title=\"Interdependent\" src=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/img6_interdependent.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"199\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/img6_interdependent.gif 555w, https:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/img6_interdependent-300x119.gif 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>And now <strong>they<\/strong> have a &#8220;problem.&#8221;\u00a0 Their capacity to make a personal difference through <em>their<\/em> work requires that <em>first<\/em> you can make a difference in yours.<\/p>\n<p>Your mutual problem: you each require autonomy for outcomes for which your <em>job<\/em> holds you &#8220;accountable.&#8221;\u00a0 But you &#8220;need each other&#8221; for those for which your <em>roles<\/em> share responsibility.<\/p>\n<p>These people, doing their individual <em>work<\/em> in these simultaneous mental and organizational &#8220;spaces,&#8221; comprise the &#8220;territory&#8221; that our organizational &#8220;maps&#8221; can&#8217;t quite capture through the &#8220;top-down&#8221; or &#8220;bottom-up&#8221; job pyramids that presently serve as organizational maps.<\/p>\n<p><strong>MAPPING MEANING<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>With brains <strong>and<\/strong> minds pre-programmed to simultaneously seek <em>meaning<\/em>, two forms of meaning must be taken into account \u2013 <em>personal<\/em> and <em>organizational<\/em> \u2013 and how <strong>together<\/strong> they influence each individual action.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>Personal meaning<\/strong><br \/>\nWhen thinking about the <em>personal meaning<\/em> of actions by individuals and organizations, each circle represents a <em>mindset<\/em> within which one continually determines how to <em>make a difference<\/em>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/personalmeaning1.gif\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-214\" title=\"Personal Meaning\" src=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/personalmeaning1.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"310\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/personalmeaning1.gif 600w, https:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/personalmeaning1-300x186.gif 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>Organizational meaning<\/strong><br \/>\nWhen this format is used to think about the systemic meaning of decisions we are now looking through the lens of a <strong><em>role<\/em> map<\/strong>.\u00a0 We see people&#8217;s functional <strong>roles<\/strong> in the system as opposed to their individual <strong>jobs<\/strong>.\u00a0 These are usually interdependent roles that <strong>must<\/strong> be performed regardless of who is in the job.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/organizationalmeaning2.gif\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-215\" title=\"Organizational Meaning\" src=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/organizationalmeaning2.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"230\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/organizationalmeaning2.gif 600w, https:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/organizationalmeaning2-300x138.gif 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>When used as a &#8220;personal&#8221; map, this framework can (like a traditional organization chart) still address the system&#8217;s need to determine &#8220;jobs&#8221; that perform the work tasks that need to be done and where. These determine what the system sets <em>competency<\/em> standards for, hires for, supervises, and evaluates.<\/li>\n<li>When used as a &#8220;role map,&#8221; it portrays the <strong>roles<\/strong> (regardless of individual <em>competencies<\/em>) that comprise the system&#8217;s <em>capacity<\/em> to accomplish its purposes, and sustain itself.\u00a0 These &#8220;Roles&#8221; are determined by the priority of <strong>demands<\/strong> the immediate context places on the work to be performed.\u00a0 Roles are usually <em>responsive<\/em> in nature and played out within constraints of limited <em>time<\/em> and <em>information<\/em>.\u00a0 Unfortunately. people often have to work around the system and develop &#8220;informal systems&#8221; to meet these role demands.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Because the role map portrays a more <em>natural<\/em> alignment of &#8220;jobs&#8221; it makes it possible to &#8220;see&#8221; the connectedness of the system&#8217;s sustained &#8220;roles&#8221; (where the dots need to be connected), and the need to build on these links to develop processes that support the disconnected &#8220;jobs&#8221; many people currently are held accountable for performing.<\/p>\n<p>It also offers a more appropriate template for envisioning the ideal structure of a system&#8217;s work that must be sustained over time.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, it can serve as a more appropriate template for envisioning the &#8220;structure&#8221; of work before &#8220;restructuring&#8221; it.\u00a0 In many ways it offers leaders a missing dimension of &#8220;Vision.&#8221;\u00a0 Everyone knows about the importance of vision as the attracting &#8220;light at the end of the tunnel.&#8221;\u00a0 This provides a <em>vision<\/em> of the present system as the light at <strong>this<\/strong> end of the tunnel \u2013 the starting point for any change.\u00a0\u00a0 And it&#8217;s a picture in which everyone can find their place.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s important because to perform your <strong>job<\/strong> you need to know what to do and how to do it.\u00a0 To perform your <strong>role<\/strong> effectively you need to know the fit and interdependence of your job and all the others in the system.\u00a0 <strong>And<\/strong> have ways to tap into that knowledge.<\/p>\n<p><strong>NAVIGATING WITH THIS MAP OF THE TERRITORY<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Like the screen of a radar scope or MRI, this offers a way of seeing and understanding the &#8220;given&#8221; <em>both\/and<\/em> natural <em>territory<\/em> on which we create and sustain schools.<\/p>\n<p>It can be used to raise questions about how each person in the system can get personal meaning, joy, and satisfaction from accomplishing the purposes of their work.\u00a0 And, at the same time the other &#8220;map&#8221; raises questions about how the &#8220;<em>system<\/em>&#8221; can organize and support that same satisfying work as part of accomplishing the <em>system&#8217;s<\/em> purpose.<\/p>\n<p>Using this alignment as a strategic <em>lens<\/em> offers a way of seeing and understanding the natural <em>territory<\/em> that can:<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; capture the &#8220;particle and wave&#8221; <em>duality<\/em> of its nature.\u00a0 It can, at one time represent the world from each <strong>individual&#8217;s<\/strong> view of his\/her &#8220;job;&#8221; and, at another time, the <strong>organization&#8217;s<\/strong> view of that individual&#8217;s interrelated &#8220;role&#8221; as the whole organization accomplishes its purposes<br \/>\n&#8212; suggest <strong>why<\/strong> individuals within organizations may act as they do, and<br \/>\n&#8212; indicate <strong>possibilities<\/strong> for using those <em>natural<\/em> processes to accomplish <em>both<\/em> individual <em>and<\/em> organizational purposes.<\/p>\n<p>As a research tool, this view enables one to apply a core principle of human development &#8212; <em>catch-them-doing-something-right<\/em> &#8212; and then use it as a resource to build on.\u00a0 &#8220;<em>Right<\/em>,&#8221; in this case being the tapping of <em>natural <\/em>thinking processes in one\u2019s work.<\/p>\n<p>Elsewhere on this website, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/?page_id=9\">CATCH THEM DOING SOMETHING RIGHT<\/a> describes how this lens was used to ask different questions and to better understand the scope and nature of a specific school system&#8217;s work.\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/?page_id=62\">WHAT CAN BE SEEN&#8230;AND LEARNED?<\/a> begins to present some of the thinking and learning products of that process. More general observations of what the world education looks like from this lens&#8217; perspective will be found at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/?page_id=178\" target=\"_self\">WHAT ELSE CAN BE &#8220;SEEN&#8221; THROUGH THE LENS<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;<em>One&#8217;s destination is never a place,<br \/>\nbut rather a new way of looking at things<\/em>.&#8221; &#8211; Henry Miller<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;If you want to teach people a new way of thinking, don&#8217;t bother trying to teach them. Instead, give them a tool, the use of which will lead to new ways of thinking.&#8221;\u00a0 &#8211; Buckminster Fuller \u201cIt&#8217;s never enough to tell people about some new insight. \u00a0Instead of pouring knowledge into people&#8217;s heads, you need [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":3,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2"}],"version-history":[{"count":23,"href":"https:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31,"href":"https:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2\/revisions\/31"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sabusense.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}